On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Doesn't pgpool do this?
>
> No, and in fact that's exactly why the proposed implementation isn't
> ever going to be in core: it's not possible to do it portably.
I'm surprised. Doesn't apache httpd do this? Does it have to do a whole
load of non-portable stuff? It seems to work on a whole load of platforms.
Matthew
--
I would like to think that in this day and age people would know better than
to open executables in an e-mail. I'd also like to be able to flap my arms
and fly to the moon. -- Tim Mullen
