On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>
> On 18/03/2008, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
>> Isn't a 10 or 24 spindle RAID 5 array awfully likely to encounter a
>> double disk failure (such as during the load imposed by rebuild onto a
>> spare) ?
that's why you should use raid6 (allowing for dual failures)
David Lang