On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue feb 24 21:53:35 -0300 2011:
>
>> Personally, I think that if we're going to create additional project
>> lists, we should launch a mailman instance instead of adding them to
>> majordomo. That way we can spread admin duties around, since we have a
>> bunch of people who know mailman, and only one who understands majordomo.
>
> Managing a single set of archive files is already enough trouble.
>
> ... hey, but then, I think Mailman has an option to not do the pipermail
> stuff and just stash the archives in mboxes just like Majordomo. That
> would let us handle both things together. If that really works, maybe
> the archive part wouldn't be that problematic after all. (But I'm not
> gonna moderate any Mailman crap.)
My experience with Mailman is exactly that also ... it is great for the
end user, but crap from an admin side fo things, especially if you want to
do sstuff from the command line ...
there really is no reason why things for majordomo are "pivoting" on me,
since, as Alvaro has admitted, and I have, there is more then one of us
that knows the system ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org
