Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Date
Msg-id aisX7lLTLDJY4I4W@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread
In response to Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Jun-11, Álvaro Herrera wrote:

> In the end I decided to go with the flow and changed to use "first"
> logic rather than "last".  I also figured that we should change the
> other two places you pointed out at the start of the thread to use the
> same coding style.  Since this is mostly cosmetic, I don't feel
> compelled to back-patch it, and pushed only to master.
> 
> Another place I noticed while looking this over is psql's
> describeOneTableDetails(), per the attached patch.  It's essentially
> more of the same, but arguably different enough that I judged it
> warranted posting before pushing.

Crap, I just noticed that Peter Eisentraut had made himself committer of
this CF entry.  Apologies, I've had this marked as pending on my inbox
for so long that it didn't occur to me to check the CF page.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: uuidv7 improperly accepts dates before 1970-01-01
Next
From: Andres Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove redundant DISTINCT when GROUP BY already guarantees uniqueness