Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries
Date
Msg-id ainidgpzJaWhtApU@paquier.xyz
Whole thread
In response to Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes:
>> I think we should just ditch the idea that operators live in schemas.
>
> How would you do that without removing user-defined operators
> altogether?  (And thereby breaking most extensions.)

I am ready to estimate that the amount of existing users that would be
pissed after such a removal would be higher than the number of users
feeling safer with their queries after this operator capability is
removed.  All of them are probably already using their own search_path
for queries they care about anyway.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: GetBufferDescriptor() being called for local buffers from MarkBufferDirtyHint()
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [(known) BUG] DELETE/UPDATE more than one row in partitioned foreign table