Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0
Date
Msg-id af2ODKxUkLzFIiuX@paquier.xyz
Whole thread
In response to Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Not sure I follow, anyone still building with a X years out of support OpenSSL
> will most likely keep doing so regardless of what CVE's are published.  It
> could of course make backpatching trickier if thats what you mean?

Argh.  I've misread you here, reading a "lowest" rather than
"highest".   Documenting that 3.6 is the highest version support on
14-stable would also work here.  My apologies for the confusion.

If the patches for REL_14_STABLE to add support for 4.0 prove to be
low-risk while messing with 1.0.1, that would the best course of
action, of course.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: FOR PORTION OF does not recompute GENERATED STORED columns that depend on the range column
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0