> On 8 May 2026, at 09:17, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Not sure I follow, anyone still building with a X years out of support OpenSSL
>> will most likely keep doing so regardless of what CVE's are published. It
>> could of course make backpatching trickier if thats what you mean?
>
> Argh. I've misread you here, reading a "lowest" rather than
> "highest". Documenting that 3.6 is the highest version support on
> 14-stable would also work here. My apologies for the confusion.
Ah, now it makes more sense =)
> If the patches for REL_14_STABLE to add support for 4.0 prove to be
> low-risk while messing with 1.0.1, that would the best course of
> action, of course.
I think the changes are straightforward enough that we can go ahead with them.
I'll re-test and re-post a new patchset for all branches once the minors ship.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
