Re: Make copyObject work in C++ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Date
Msg-id aeDIj2SBDl0EHZtb@bdtpg
Whole thread
In response to Re: Make copyObject work in C++  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.04.26 15:10, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 11:41:39AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 07:54:07AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, I have committed the shown patch.
> > > 
> > > d50c86e74375 added a comment mentionning that StaticAssertStmt is deprecated, so
> > > we really need the one added in test_cplusplusext.cpp?
> > 
> > Now that 66ad764c8d5 is in, the only remaining use of StaticAssertStmt() is in
> > test_cplusplusext.cpp. What about the attached to get rid of it?
> 
> This is a test module.  Even if the construct is deprecated, we can still
> test it.

Right, but I was thinking that if we introduce a "pg_attribute_deprecated" macro
(like discussed in [1] and [2]) and make use of it for StaticAssertStmt(), then
this test module would generate Warnings.

We can still come back to it should the above be implemented.

[1]: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGK2zuRevnNzCpVzLA7ieHnJoYPnDvgtWRcB4pVnOzchhQ%40mail.gmail.com
[2]: https://postgr.es/m/aRGa87Ab0f3ItWRV@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mihail Nikalayeu
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Next
From: lakshmi
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgbench: remove synchronous prepare