Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
Date
Msg-id adEhRzu4YM7ztLXr@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority  (Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 08:25:26AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> "Scores greater than or equal to <literal>1.0</literal>" in the comments
> of each field are misleading. This conflates scoring with vacuum/analyze
> eligibility and it's possible with a autovacuum_*_weight < 1.0 to trigger an
> autovacuum/analyze.

Ah, that's unfortunate.  I think it'd be good to give folks some idea of
what autovacuum will actually process.  I wonder if we could adjust the
documentation accordingly.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TupleDescAttr bounds checks
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: vectorized CRC on ARM64