Re: Improving postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id ad7a52cb361e403d60c4b8a73934557a@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving postgresql.conf  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: Improving postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 
> Try yourself, I did the experiment changing the cpu_tuple_cost and
> commenting out the cpu_tuple_cost, after sending the SIGHUP to
> postmaster the value remain: 0.005 that is not the default value at
> all. 
Ducking the added documentation discussion for a minute, I think we
can agree that the commented-default concept is at the least confusing,
at the most broken. 
> I understand your points below.  However, the group has weighed in the
> direction of clearly showing non-default values and not duplicating
> documentation.  We can change that, but you will need more folks
> agreeing with your direction. 
How do we do determine this? Perhaps a reasoned discussion on hackers?
I'll start, by putting forth the proposal that the default-comment
behavior does more harm than good because it is confusing and broken,
and should be scrapped in favor of a simple "what you see is what you get"
behavior, just like every other configuration file.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200406151936
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFAz4iBvJuQZxSWSsgRAkO8AKD7t4qdWbeqs7aAuw5ZsQOsKUwGQACfb0/Y
x+vvo6KZ2NgZ9i+4BjIX9yg=
=13P0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb initial password
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore recovery from error.