Re: Improving postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 40C966C9.20608@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Improving postgresql.conf  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Re: Improving postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruce Momjian wrote:

| Gaetano Mendola wrote:
|
|>Bruce Momjian wrote:
|>
|> > I understand your points below.  However, the group has weighed in the
|> > direction of clearly showing non-default values and not duplicating
|> > documentation.  We can change that, but you will need more folks
|> > agreeing with your direction.
|>
|>I don't remember the behaviour but tell me what happen if
|>I comment out a value changing the value. Kill UP the postmater.
|>Recommenting that value and now re killing the postmaster.
|>
|>I believe that postmaster will not run with the default value.
|>Who will look the configuration file will not understand the right
|>reality.
|
|
| If you comment a variable in postgresql.conf, it will use the
| default value.

That's not true at least with the version 7.4.2.

Try yourself, I did the experiment changing the cpu_tuple_cost and
commenting out the cpu_tuple_cost, after sending the SIGHUP to
postmaster the value remain: 0.005 that is not the default value at
all.



Regards
Gaetano Mendola








-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAyWbI7UpzwH2SGd4RAre5AJ4sakTxqvcjbq8Cz6Qoj2bnDO5/7gCfTWdp
nyWvDNTeQNEfwYJWHHL+0W0=
=JFgw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Accelerating aggregates
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Accelerating aggregates