On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 03:28:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > On 2026-03-26 Th 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm not sure I want to expend the brain cells to figure out whether
> >> this is a correct/complete patch. If pg_bsd_indent were less of an
> >> undercommented spaghetti-code nightmare, maybe fixing it here would
> >> be reasonable. But as things stand, why don't we just fix this in
> >> the perl wrapper, as attached?
>
> > Well, I thought we were trying to reduce the fixups we did in pgindent.
>
> Yeah, other things being equal I too would prefer to fix it within
> pg_bsd_indent. But other things are not equal: the complexity
> and reviewability of the proposed v2 patch are not comparable to
> a one-liner fix in the wrapper.
I think the only way forward if we want to continue modifying
pg_bsd_indent is to rename most of the variables and add some sanity to
the code.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
