Re: backup manifests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: backup manifests
Date
Msg-id aa9fbed1-247a-3565-3c55-22b1cfb694fb@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup manifests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,

On 1/14/20 9:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
>> I'm happy to work up a prototype unless the consensus is that we
>> absolutely don't want a second JSON parser in core.
> 
> How much code are we talking about?  If the answer is "a few hundred
> lines", it's a lot easier to swallow than if it's "a few thousand".

It's currently about a thousand lines but we have a lot of functions to 
convert to/from specific types.  I imagine the line count would be 
similar using one of the approaches I discussed above.

Current source attached for reference.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove libpq.rc, use win32ver.rc for libpq