Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch
Date
Msg-id aZ7NRaiL9tp0NegO@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:24:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> 8f1791c61    Fix some cases of indirectly casting away const.

Worth to also back-patch 9f7565c6c2d (as 8f1791c61 follow up)?

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup: removed an unnecessary use of memset in FindStreamingStart
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Options to control remote transactions’ access/deferrable modes in postgres_fdw