Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch
Date
Msg-id 184946.1772034930@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:24:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 8f1791c61    Fix some cases of indirectly casting away const.

> Worth to also back-patch 9f7565c6c2d (as 8f1791c61 follow up)?

Good idea.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New isolation test insert-conflict-do-update-4 outputs rows in alternative ordering
Next
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits