On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 10:37:43AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable can also return XLREAD_WOULDBLOCK when the
> caller set nonblocking. The comment only talks about XLREAD_FAIL vs
> “waits in standby,” so it still doesn’t describe that third outcome.
> That omission pre-dates this patch, should we expand the comment
> mention the nonblocking case as well?
The outcome related to XLREAD_WOULDBLOCK is implied in the last
sentence of the comment block standing at the top of the function,
which seems OK to me.
--
Michael
