Re: AIX support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: AIX support
Date
Msg-id aYKMtRhx7zW1k62E@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AIX support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 11:33:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Remind me again why anyone would choose to run Postgres on this
> platform?  Why are we moving mountains to make it possible?

Based on the numbers you are posting for the environment tested, I
cannot think of a sane reason that somebody would do that.  That
points to the same feeling that I always have when reading this
thread: as far as I understand it is not really possible to have an
access to hardware that one could use to test any of this stuff or
even write patches to support it.  If I/O is bad in any environments
where a patch is run, the time investment is moot compared to other
nix or even WIN32 environments where a full check-world usually takes
no more than 10 minutes for one branch, even on a laptop.

Saying that, I'm really glad for the report that has led to the
discovery fixed in d46aa32ea5ce.  Opportunistic improvements not
specific to AIX are also good to know about: they show long-term
benefits everywhere.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: transfer pg_largeobject_metadata's files when possible
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition