Thanks for the new patch.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 04:12:02PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote:
> I went back-forth on if it makes sense to provide the name as an
> extra argument and decided it provides more flexibility. For example
> I can use the same init callback and arguments for different segments.
If the initialization callback function needed the name, it could be
provided via the "void *" callback argument, right? I'm not following why
we need to provide it separately.
--
nathan
