Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq
Date
Msg-id aLT9xVsTVp0j3zWy@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> When looking into why the SNI tests failed on Windows I think I found a
> pre-existing issue that we didn't have tests for, which my patch added tests
> for and thus broke.
>
> The test I added was to check restarting and reloading with ssl passphrase
> commands (which we do have testcoverage for) with a subsequent connection test
> to ensure it didn't just work to start the cluster.

Would this part be better if extracted from the main patch and then
backpatched?  Even if not backpatched, a split would be cleaner on
HEAD, I assume, leading to less fuzz with the main patch.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Generate pgstat_count_slru*() functions for slru using macros
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)