On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hmm, don't you find strange that dbcommands.h is still included there?
> I wondered about that and found out that we have get_database_name()
> declared there. It sort-of makes sense, because it was originally done
> by scanning pg_database, but since commit cb98e6fb8fd4 introduced a
> syscache for it, we can have this routine in lsyscache.c/h instead,
> where it feels more at home. It also seems more sensible to declare
> get_database_oid() in pg_database.h. After these two changes, a lot of
> files can stop including dbcommands.h. This seems a nice cleanup to me,
> and passes headerscheck.
>
> 33 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
Indeed, that's a nice located cleanup.
--
Michael
