On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:28:14PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 03:20:55PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Can we add a note to wait_event_names.txt about the required
>> ordering/matching of the non-predefined LWLocks? Otherwise, these patches
>> look pretty good to me.
>
> Something else I just thought of: could we remove the list of built-in
> tranches in lwlock.h with some macro magic that generates it from
> lwlocktranchelist.h, too?
Ah, you mean removing the need to have to maintain BuiltinTrancheIds.
This structure depends on NUM_INDIVIDUAL_LWLOCKS for the start value.
Not really an objection per-se, but trying to automate everything may
impact the readability of this area of the code.
--
Michael
