On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 01:52:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I considered putting the sortsupport functions first, since they have a lower support function
>> number, but I thought defining them in the same order as we've been doing was a tiny bit safer.
>> Maybe that is superstitious.
>
> Yeah, I'd be inclined to swap them. I dislike code that has no
> ordering principle other than feature development order.
Ordering them by number in the unified script makes more sense here.
> LGTM other than that nit. Michael, do you want to do the
> honors, or shall I?
Sure, I can look at that today.
--
Michael
