Re: Fix comment in btree_gist--1.8--1.9.sql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fix comment in btree_gist--1.8--1.9.sql
Date
Msg-id 1329465.1752083528@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix comment in btree_gist--1.8--1.9.sql  (Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: Fix comment in btree_gist--1.8--1.9.sql
List pgsql-hackers
Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> writes:
> On 7/9/25 08:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for merging those two while we still can.

> Patch attached, based on REL_18_STABLE.

> I considered putting the sortsupport functions first, since they have a lower support function
> number, but I thought defining them in the same order as we've been doing was a tiny bit safer.
> Maybe that is superstitious.

Yeah, I'd be inclined to swap them.  I dislike code that has no
ordering principle other than feature development order.

LGTM other than that nit.  Michael, do you want to do the
honors, or shall I?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects