On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:18:18AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Knowing that I'm indirectly responsible for this mess, I would like to
> take care of that myself. Would that be OK for you?
I would be grateful if you took care of it.
> Another approach that we could use is an injection point with some
> LOGs that show some information based on what VacuumParams holds.
> That would be the cheapest method (no need for any data), and entirely
> stable as we would look at the stack. Perhaps going down to that is
> not really necessary for the sake of this thread.
+1 for this. I did something similar to verify the other bugs I reported,
and this seems far easier to maintain than potentially-unstable tests that
require lots of setup and that depend on secondary effects.
--
nathan
