Re: Retiring some encodings? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Retiring some encodings?
Date
Msg-id aDEPLWynq2fHscHc@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Retiring some encodings?  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Retiring some encodings?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:58:46PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Another point is, whether other DBMS support GB18030 or not. If they
> support, but PostgreSQL would not in the future, that could be a
> reason to move away from PostgreSQL.

Yeah, that's a good point.  I would also question what's the benefit
in using GB18030 over UTF-8, though.  An obvious one I can see is
because legacy applications never get updated.

On my side, I'll try to grab some actual numbers or at least a trend
of them.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: tighten generic_option_name, or store more carefully in catalog?
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements