On 10.11.22 11:08, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote: > This looks pretty good to me. The refactoring of the > non-Windows parts > makes sense. The Windows parts look reasonable on manual > inspection, > but again, I don't have access to Windows here, so someone else > should > also look it over. > > I was going to say that at least it is getting tested on the CI, but > I have found out that meson changes version(). That is fixed in this > version. > > > Now is currently failing due to [1], so maybe we can leave this patch on > hold until that's addressed. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAC%2BAXB1wJEqfKCuVcNpoH%3Dgxd61N%3D7c2fR3Ew6YRPpSfEUA%3DyQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAC%2BAXB1wJEqfKCuVcNpoH%3Dgxd61N%3D7c2fR3Ew6YRPpSfEUA%3DyQ%40mail.gmail.com> What is the status of this now? I think the other issue has been addressed?
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных