On 09.02.23 09:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 06.02.23 11:11, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 06/02/2023 11:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Instead of defining the same set of macros several times, define it once
>>> in an appropriate header file. In passing, convert to inline functions.
>>
>> Looks good to me. Did you consider moving PG_GETARG_ITEMPOINTER and
>> PG_RETURN_ITEMPOINTER, too? They're only used in tid.c, but for most
>> datatypes, we define the PG_GETARG and PG_RETURN macros in the same
>> header file as the the Datum conversion functions.
>
> Yeah that makes sense. Here is an updated patch for that.
committed
