Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Date
Msg-id a5b8e59b-f23c-535f-896b-3594b4120622@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
List pgsql-docs
On 8/30/17 13:28, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 30 Aug 2017, at 16:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> Uh, why would anybody be reading the pg10 docs in order to compile
>>> modules for 8.2?  I vote to just drop the suggestion that there needs to
>>> be an #ifdef guard altogether.
>>
>> +1 ... if you are reading the current docs, they're going to tell you
>> lots of things that won't work in 8.1.
>
> Patch updated with dropping the #ifdef guard paragraph.  Also removed the
> mention of when the magic block was introduced as it seemed an odd piece of
> archaeology to keep around when the guard paragraph was removed.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Row Level Security Policies documentation doesn't mentionlack of support for views
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion