Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Date
Msg-id E2FCBAD9-A88B-416D-B4CF-703654B05F5C@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
List pgsql-docs
> On 30 Aug 2017, at 16:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Uh, why would anybody be reading the pg10 docs in order to compile
>> modules for 8.2?  I vote to just drop the suggestion that there needs to
>> be an #ifdef guard altogether.
>
> +1 ... if you are reading the current docs, they're going to tell you
> lots of things that won't work in 8.1.

Patch updated with dropping the #ifdef guard paragraph.  Also removed the
mention of when the magic block was introduced as it seemed an odd piece of
archaeology to keep around when the guard paragraph was removed.

cheers ./daniel


Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Details of how temp_buffers are actually used would benice