Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id a35f2d56-84e4-4bcf-1bb7-daa2cce9b8d4@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/12/09 10:09, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Another requirement was subpartitioning.  Will this be possible with the current infrastructure, or does this need
drasticchange?
 

It does support sub-partitioning, although the syntax is a bit different.

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgcrypto compilation error due to stack-allocated EVP_CIPHER_CTX