Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F663138@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Amit Langote [mailto:Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> On 2016/12/09 10:09, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > Another requirement was subpartitioning.  Will this be possible with the
> current infrastructure, or does this need drastic change?
> 
> It does support sub-partitioning, although the syntax is a bit different.

Super great!  I'm excited to try the feature when I have time.  I hope I can contribute to the quality by find any
bug.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgcrypto compilation error due to stack-allocated EVP_CIPHER_CTX
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take