Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id a240a4e9-dcfa-df00-c725-3cb98b62cc23@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/25/2017 05:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
>> I understand that my experience with storage devices is unusually
>> narrow compared to everyone else here. That's why I remain neutral on
>> the high level question of whether or not we ought to enable checksums
>> by default. I'll ask other hackers to answer what may seem like a very
>> naive question, while bearing what I just said in mind. The question
>> is: Have you ever actually seen a checksum failure in production? And,
>> if so, how helpful was it?

No.

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CONNECTION LIMIT and Parallel Query don't play well together