Re: Remove support for old realpath() API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Remove support for old realpath() API
Date
Msg-id ZrG35H6yZG0GbJ7g@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove support for old realpath() API  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Remove support for old realpath() API
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 10:08:04AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> We don't seem to have any mentions of POSIX or SuS in docs, in the
>> installation sections. There are a few mentions of POSIX-1.2008 and
>> POSIX-1.2001 it in the commit log, though, where we require features
>> specified by those. Can we rely on everything from POSIX-1-2008
>> nowadays, or is it more on a case-by-case basis, depending on which
>> parts of POSIX are supported by various platforms?
>
> I'd say it's still case-by-case.  Perhaps everything in POSIX-1.2008
> is supported now on every platform we care about, but perhaps not.

Just pointing at the message where this has been discussed previously,
for reference:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1457809.1662232534@sss.pgh.pa.us

Leaving Solaris aside because there is nothing older than 11 in the
buildfarm currently, I am dubious that it is a good idea to remove
this code knowing that we have a thread from a few months ago about
the fact that we have folks complaining about AIX support and that we
should bring it back:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CY5PR11MB63928CC05906F27FB10D74D0FD322@CY5PR11MB6392.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we still need parent column in pg_backend_memory_context?