Re: Add a GUC check hook to ensure summarize_wal cannot be enabled when wal_level is minimal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:08:48PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> +/*
> + * GUC check_hook for summarize_wal
> + */
> +bool
> +check_summarize_wal(bool *newval, void **extra, GucSource source)
> +{
> +    if (*newval && wal_level == WAL_LEVEL_MINIMAL)
> +    {
> +        GUC_check_errmsg("WAL cannot be summarized when \"wal_level\" is \"minimal\"");
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}

IME these sorts of GUC hooks that depend on the value of other GUCs tend to
be quite fragile.  This one might be okay because wal_level defaults to
'replica' and because there is an additional check in postmaster.c, but
that at least deserves a comment.

This sort of thing comes up enough that perhaps we should add a
better-supported way to deal with GUCs that depend on each other...

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marat Buharov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add min/max aggregate functions to BYTEA
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences