Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps
Date
Msg-id ZoMK9ZhOsWEKqxlM@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:58:16PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 3:47 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 0001 introduces a new API for registering callbacks and running them in
>> parallel on all databases in the cluster.  This new system manages a set of
>> "slots" that follow a simple state machine to asynchronously establish a
>> connection and run the queries.  It uses system() to wait for these
>> asynchronous tasks to complete.  Users of this API only need to provide two
>> callbacks: one to return the query that should be run on each database and
>> another to process the results of that query.  If multiple queries are
>> required for each database, users can provide multiple sets of callbacks.
> 
> I do really like the idea of using asynchronous communication here. It
> should be significantly cheaper than using multiple processes or
> threads, and maybe less code, too. But I'm confused about why you
> would need or want to use system() to wait for asynchronous tasks to
> complete. Wouldn't it be something like select()?

Whoops, I meant to type "select()" there.  Sorry for the confusion.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c)