Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date
Msg-id ZeUkkDzHvv7I4wYE@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 03:44:34PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 11:40:00PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>> Do you have any thoughts on reverting 007693f and introducing
>> invalidation_reason?
>
> Unless I am misinterpreting some details, ISTM we could rename this column
> to invalidation_reason and use it for both logical and physical slots.  I'm
> not seeing a strong need for another column.  Perhaps I am missing
> something...

And also, please don't be hasty in taking a decision that would
involve a revert of 007693f without informing the committer of this
commit about that.  I am adding Amit Kapila in CC of this thread for
awareness.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake