On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 11:40:00PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 3:41 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would you ever see "conflict" as false and "invalidation_reason" as
>> non-null for a logical slot?
>
> No. Because both conflict and invalidation_reason are decided based on
> the invalidation reason i.e. value of slot_contents.data.invalidated.
> IOW, a logical slot that reports conflict as true must have been
> invalidated.
>
> Do you have any thoughts on reverting 007693f and introducing
> invalidation_reason?
Unless I am misinterpreting some details, ISTM we could rename this column
to invalidation_reason and use it for both logical and physical slots. I'm
not seeing a strong need for another column. Perhaps I am missing
something...
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com