Re: Providers missing from pgdg-common for GDAL 3.7 (related to multiple missing providers from pgdg-common) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Providers missing from pgdg-common for GDAL 3.7 (related to multiple missing providers from pgdg-common)
Date
Msg-id ZbGFJQgwUiMiXqOz@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Providers missing from pgdg-common for GDAL 3.7 (related to multiple missing providers from pgdg-common)  (James Colannino <crankycyclops@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
For this issue, I suggest you contact the packager, rather than the
software development community.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 04:55:27PM -0800, James Colannino wrote:
> A little while ago this month, this was reported: https://www.spinics.net/lists
> /pgsql/msg219648.html
> 
> The issue was fixed for GDAL 3.6, but the same problem still exists for GDAL
> 3.7, which also needs to be rebuilt against armadillo 12 for rhel 8 (and
> possibly 9 as well?) This is what I get currently when I try to update my
> packages on AlmaLinux 8:
> 
> $ sudo dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:08 ago on Tue 23 Jan 2024 04:16:31 PM PST.
> Error:
>  Problem 1: package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires
> libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install both armadillo-12.6.6-1.el8.x86_64 from epel and
> armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 from @System
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires
> libgdal.so.33()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires
> gdal37-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires
> libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common requires
> libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install both armadillo-12.6.6-1.el8.x86_64 from epel and
> armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 from @System
>   - package gdal36-libs-3.6.4-6PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common requires
> libarmadillo.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> gdal36-libs-3.6.4-5PGDG.rhel8.x86_64

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: about statement execution times in the logs
Next
From: Michael Nolan
Date:
Subject: Re: undefined symbol when installing pgcrypto on 16.1