The issue was fixed for GDAL 3.6, but the same problem still exists for GDAL 3.7, which also needs to be rebuilt against armadillo 12 for rhel 8 (and possibly 9 as well?) This is what I get currently when I try to update my packages on AlmaLinux 8:
$ sudo dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:08 ago on Tue 23 Jan 2024 04:16:31 PM PST.
Error:
Problem 1: package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both armadillo-12.6.6-1.el8.x86_64 from epel and armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 from @System
- cannot install the best update candidate for package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64
Problem 2: package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires libgdal.so.33()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires gdal37-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8, but none of the providers can be installed
- package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common requires libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both armadillo-12.6.6-1.el8.x86_64 from epel and armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 from @System
- package gdal36-libs-3.6.4-6PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common requires libarmadillo.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package gdal36-libs-3.6.4-5PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
