Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly
Date
Msg-id ZajCdnAryeQSQ6Jj@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly  (Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 03:11:48PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I'd like to apply that, just let me know if you have any comments
> and/or objections.

And done on 12~15.

While on it, I have also looked at source code references on github
and debian that involve lwWaiting, and all of them rely on lwWaiting
when not waiting, making LW_WS_NOT_WAITING an equivalent.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: subscription disable_on_error not working after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION set bad conninfo
Next
From: Arne Roland
Date:
Subject: Re: A performance issue with Memoize