Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date
Msg-id Z_SrfLAjZoFq6AR6@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 05:25:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What version are you testing?  We did some work in that area in the
> v17 cycle (a45c78e32).

I am puzzled by the target version used here, as well.  If there is
more that can be improved, v19 would be the version to consider for
future improvements at this stage.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump/restore failure (dependency?) on BF serinus
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl race conditions