Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2025-04-08 00:11:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This feels quite adjacent to my complaint here:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2045026.1743801143%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>> though perhaps it's not exactly the same.
> That does sound rather plausible. What an odd coincidence that it failed like
> that so close to your email. While this specific failure probably couldn't
> have happened much earlier, it seems that it could have as part of pg_upgrade
> for longer.
I think pg_upgrade is not vulnerable to the problem, or at least not
the identical problem, because it doesn't expect pg_restore to load
table data. So I think we didn't previously have any test cases
that would expose this :-(. What I find surprising is that we
didn't get field reports much sooner.
regards, tom lane
