Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id Z_58e4fEp8eVdWK8@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Peter Eisentraut
> But worse, what you are hiding is the information what dependencies
> you are pulling in, which is the actual reason for the options.  (If there
> was no external dependency, there would be no option at all.)
> 
> This seems unnecessarily complicated and inconsistent.  Once you have made
> the choice of taking the libcurl dependency, why not build everything that
> requires it?

I agree with this reasoning and retract my suggestion to rename the option.

Thanks for the explanation,
Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: HELP: SAVEPOINT feature cases
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?