On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 8:34 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> I agree with this reasoning and retract my suggestion to rename the option.
(Thank you for chiming in; having the packager feedback has been
extremely helpful.)
While I have you, may I ask whether you're okay (from the packager
perspective) with the current division of dynamic and static
behaviors?
Dynamic: --with-libcurl builds a runtime-loadable module, and if you
don't install it, OAuth isn't supported (i.e. it's optional)
Static: --with-libcurl builds an additional linkable staticlib, which
you must link into your application (i.e. not optional)
I want to make absolutely sure the existing packager requests are not
conflicting. :D
Thanks,
--Jacob
