Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Date
Msg-id ZYPTfN9oRL5/ZHJo@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:13:16AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll
> > > push it, barring any objections.
> >
> > This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks
> > OK seen from here.
> >
> > As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most
> > common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get
> > excited about that either because that would require one to do more
> > cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps.
> 
> Thank you for the comments. Agreed.
> 
> I've just pushed, bf6260b39.
> 

Thanks!

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Function to get invalidation cause of a replication slot.
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing backslash dot for COPY FROM...CSV