Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoBQh0Nawbi-=26Zq1OydEat9bNU3VAs1vXQ_UjSPCZ1EQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll
> > push it, barring any objections.
>
> This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks
> OK seen from here.
>
> As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most
> common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get
> excited about that either because that would require one to do more
> cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps.

Thank you for the comments. Agreed.

I've just pushed, bf6260b39.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc