>On 1/14/22 1:40 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>snip]
>> We shouldn't be trying to provide
>> documentation around how to write a tool like pgbackrest, we should,
>> instead, have a tool like pgbackrest in core with its own documentation,
>> as most other RDBMS's do.
>That's an excellent solution to this problem.
While I know the reasons for not having something like pgbackrest in core, I think this is a major drawback for the
project.People coming from commercial systems are used to have that tooling included by default.
+1 for having that in core
Regards
Daniel
