Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Date
Msg-id ZIKWBC18s+IY+J2e@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:43:44PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> Please find the attached patches that can be applied on back branches
> too. v5*master.patch can be applied on master, v5*PG15.patch can be
> applied on PG15, v5*PG14.patch can be applied on PG14, v5*PG13.patch
> can be applied on PG13, v5*PG12.patch can be applied on PG12, PG11 and
> PG10.

Thanks.  The amount of minimal conflicts across all these branches is
always fun to play with.  I have finally got around and applied all
that, after doing a proper split, applying one part down to 14 and the
second back to 11.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs