Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm1kR=xNS=Aihq7fPYch3oXyzgFmjmjSwcCzBmCsqME33Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 08:31, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:43:44PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > Please find the attached patches that can be applied on back branches
> > too. v5*master.patch can be applied on master, v5*PG15.patch can be
> > applied on PG15, v5*PG14.patch can be applied on PG14, v5*PG13.patch
> > can be applied on PG13, v5*PG12.patch can be applied on PG12, PG11 and
> > PG10.
>
> Thanks.  The amount of minimal conflicts across all these branches is
> always fun to play with.  I have finally got around and applied all
> that, after doing a proper split, applying one part down to 14 and the
> second back to 11.

Thanks for pushing this.

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want a hashset type?