Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
Date
Msg-id ZH8NTh546nHLMGpr@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:00:00AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> +1 for deduplicating find_in_log. How about deduplicating advance_wal
> too so that 019_replslot_limit.pl, 033_replay_tsp_drops.pl,
> 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl and 001_stream_rep.pl can benefit
> immediately?

As in a small wrapper for pg_switch_wal() that generates N segments at
will?  I don't see why we could not do that if it proves useful in the
long run.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639)
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs